Understanding the Three Scopes of Carbon Emissions: An ESG Perspective

In the current age of i ncreased climate awareness, a new undeniable priority for businesses and investors is the reduction of their greenhouse gas emissions. Driven by environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations, accountability and transparency have become imperative across all industries alike. In order to effectively manage as well as reduce these emissions, it is vital to understand and differentiate the three scopes of carbon emissions; aptly named Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3.

This article will provide an overview of what these scopes consist of, as well as explore the difficulties of calculating Scope 3 emissions, which are unfortunately too often overlooked in a company’s carbon footprint despite their crucial importance.

Scope 1: Direct Emissions

Scope 1 emissions can be summarised as the direct greenhouse gas emissions that result from activities owned or controlled by the company. These include emissions from:

• On-site fuel combustion (e.g., boilers, furnaces)

• Company-owned vehicles (e.g., delivery trucks, corporate cars)

• Industrial processes (e.g., chemical production, oil refining)

These emissions are relatively straightforward to measure, as they originate from sources that the company directly controls. Tracking Scope 1 emissions usually involves monitoring fuel consumption, which can be calculated using established emissions factors.

Challenges in Scope 1 Emissions

 While Scope 1 emissions are easier to quantify, they still present challenges, particularly in industries with complex operations, as can be observed in manufacturing or logistics. Precise data collection and accurate reporting are key to ensuring the credibility of emission analysis and reduction efforts.

Scope 2: Energy Purchased Emissions

Scope 2 emissions refer to indirect greenhouse gas emissions from the generation of purchased energy, such as electricity, heating, and cooling. While these emissions occur off-site, they are directly correlated to the company’s energy consumption.

For the majority of businesses, scope 2 emissions can represent a significant amount of their total carbon footprint, more notably observed in energy intensive sectors. These companies have a plethora of ways of reducing their Scope 2 emissions, such as implementing energy efficiency measures, or (ideally) transitioning to renewable energy sources!

Challenges in Scope 2 Emissions

Calculating Scope 2 emissions can be slightly more complex than Scope 1 due to variations in the carbon intensity of the energy grid across different regions. Companies often rely on market-based and location-based methodologies to report their Scope 2 emissions, which can lead to discrepancies if not properly managed.

Scope 3: (Indirect) Value Chain Emissions

Last but not least, Scope 3 emissions are the most challenging to address, encompassing indirect emissions that occur throughout a company’s entire value chain. These emissions are not directly controlled by the company but result from its activities, both upstream and downstream. Scope 3 emissions are often divided into 15 distinct categories, with the first 8 encompassing upstream activities, and the latter 7 representing downstream. These include but are not limited to:

• Purchased goods and services

• Business travel and employee commuting

• Transportation and distribution

• Waste generated in operations

• Use of sold products and end-of-life treatment

Scope 3 emissions typically account for the largest share of a company’s carbon footprint, often exceeding Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions combined. For example, in industries like retail and food production, emissions from suppliers, logistics, and product use can constitute up to 90% of total greenhouse gas emissions! 

The Complexities of Calculating Scope 3 Emissions


The main challenge in calculating Scope 3 emissions lies in the large umbrella and diversity of activities covered. Unlike Scope 1 and Scope 2, which rely on data which is controlled or directly influenced by the company, Scope 3 emissions require detailed information from a wide range of external sources. This can include suppliers, customers, transportation providers, and waste handlers.


Some Key Challenges in Scope 3 Emission Calculations:


-       Data Availability and Quality: Suppliers often don’t bother to track their emissions or may use inconsistent reporting methods, leading to increased difficulty in gathering accurate data from the entire value chain, especially with more moving parts. Additionally, smaller suppliers may even lack the necessary resources or expertise to accurately report their emissions.


-       Complex Supply Chains: At the peak of globalization, supply chains have never been more complex, and usually involve an unnecessarily large amount of tiers of suppliers. Going deeper into this supply chain leads to increased difficulty in obtaining reliable data, and often requires an unattainable level of collaboration and transparency, from everyone involved. In todays corporate landscape unfortunately, this is too good to be true.


-       Estimation and Assumptions: As a half-hearted attempt to provide some sort of amount, companies will often rely on estimation methods as well as industry averages in order to calculate their Scope 3. While these estimations might be a good starting point to tackle this complex Scope, they almost never accurately reflect the true carbon impact of a companies activities or products.


-       Double Counting Risks: Because Scope 3 emissions overlap with other companies' Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, there is a risk of double counting. For example, the emissions from a purchased product might be reported both by the manufacturer (Scope 1) and the buyer (Scope 3), leading to even further inaccuracies. Clear reporting standards and guidance from frameworks like the Greenhouse Gas Protocol are essential to avoid such issues.


-       Dynamic Nature of Scope 3 Emissions: Unlike direct emissions, which tend to be more stable, Scope 3 emissions can fluctuate significantly based on changes in supply chain operations, shifts in consumer behaviour, and variations in product usage patterns. This dynamic nature adds to the difficulty of consistent and accurate reporting.


The Path Forward: Addressing Scope 3 Emissions


Despite the plethora of complexities we’ve outlines, addressing Scope 3 emissions is imperative for businesses aiming to meet their climate goals and align with stakeholder expectations. While it seems discouraging, fret not! Companies can take several steps to improve their Scope 3 emissions reporting and reduction efforts:


  • Engaging with Suppliers: Building strong relationships with suppliers and encouraging them to track and report their emissions can help improve data accuracy and foster shared accountability for climate action.


  • Implement Sustainable Procurement Practices: Prioritizing suppliers with robust sustainability credentials can help reduce upstream emissions, tackling the problem from its source.


  • Investing in Technology and Data Analytics: Leveraging digital tools, such as carbon accounting software and blockchain technology, can enhance transparency and streamline emissions data collection.


Conclusion


Understanding and managing carbon emissions across all three scopes is a vital component of any robust ESG strategy. While Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions are relatively easier to quantify and control, Scope 3 emissions represent the most significant challenge due to their indirect and complex nature. By actively engaging with stakeholders across the value chain, leveraging advanced technologies, and committing to transparency, companies can make meaningful progress in reducing their overall carbon footprint and contribute to a more sustainable future.


For businesses serious about their ESG performance, tackling Scope 3 emissions is not just an option—it’s a necessity. It may be a daunting task, but it is also an opportunity to drive innovation, build resilience, and create long-term value for both the company and the planet.


How Can My Company Improve Sustainability and ESG?



Here at NBS factory, your reputation matters. We're committed to sustainable practices backed by science. We understand the value of ESG and how to help with these challenges by DIAGNOSING your branding, MONITORING your reputation, AVOIDING legal risks, and MEASURING engagement.

 

The clock is ticking and there's no time for BS 😅 Start your journey to ESG excellence with a single step; we're here to support you. Send us an email now hello@nbs-factory.com or click here 👉 to request a demo 

This image shows purple washing in companies.
by Anne Dumesges 20 November 2024
Purple washing refers to the superficial adoption of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives by brands that mislead consumers about their genuine commitment to these values.
Une image qui démontre une activité eco-responsable comparé aux activités industrielle
by Anne Dumesges 15 November 2024
Cet article détaille les trois scopes d'émissions de carbone. Il met en évidence les défis liés au calcul des émissions, notamment les émissions de scope 3 et leur nature complexe.
L'image met en avant la durabilité dans l'industrie de l'aluminium.
by Anne Dumesges 12 November 2024
Le post détaille les perspectives de NBS factory sur l'industrie de l'aluminium et leur contenu ESG.
The picture shows recycling in the aluminium industry.
by Anne Dumesges 5 November 2024
The post details NBS factory's insights about the aluminium industry and their ESG content.
L'image montre la fusion de l'ESG et de l'IA.
by Anne Dumesges 4 November 2024
Le post détaille l'utilisation croissante de l'IA dans l'ESG et la façon dont elle peut transformer notre approche du développement durable.
The picture shows the amalgamation of ESG &AI.
by Anne Dumesges 29 October 2024
The post details the increasing use of AI in ESG and how it can transform the way we approach sustainability.
Les données financières et extra-financières sont mises sur le même pied.
by Anne Dumesges 25 October 2024
Le CSRD et l'Europe montrent la voie à suivre en matière de transition durable pour le monde entier. Il s'agit d'une étape importante qui doit être démystifiée.
Financial and non-financial data are put on the same footing.
by Anne Dumesges 23 October 2024
CSRD and Europe are leading the way in sustainable transition for the whole world. It's a milestone that needs to be demystified.
L'image montre comment McDonald's transforme son M en W pendant le mois de mars.
by Anne Dumesges 21 October 2024
Le post détaille l'histoire et l'importance du 8 mars et explique pourquoi, au lieu d'une seule journée par an, nous devons parler des droits des femmes tout au long de l'année. #EverydayForWomen
The image shows how McDonald's flips its M into a W during March.
by Anne Dumesges 16 October 2024
The post details the history and importance of March 8 and why instead of just a day every year, we need to talk about women's rights all year round. #EverydayForWomen
Share by: